|
Published on Friday, October 3, 2008 - 4:00am |
|
Do The Critics Feel Safe Recommending SciFi’s SANCTUARY??
|
A sci-fi procedural from writer-producer Damian Kindler (“PSI Factor,” “Stargate SG-1,” “Stargate: Atlantis”), “Sanctuary” follows an immortal doctor (“Stargate” vet Amanda Tapping) who makes it her business to contain and protect a menagerie of otherworldly creatures. It employs an unusual amount of green-screen and apparently started life as a Web series on sanctuaryforall.com last year.
The New York Times says:
… sits at about the same level of writing and performance as the “Stargate” shows, which means it doesn’t have the narrative force of “Battlestar Galactica” or the wit and creativity of Sci Fi’s best original series, “Eureka.” It’s not an embarrassment for the channel, but it doesn’t raise the stakes either. … You might think, “Well, the animation can’t be cheap,” but you haven’t seen the show …
The Los Angeles Times says:
… a draggy piece of somber silliness …
The Chicago Tribune says:
… pace is a little on the stately side, and the show is competent if not particularly innovative sci fi. …
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette says:
… another disappointing entry. It's a lot like BBC America's "Torchwood," just without the wit and a charismatic lead actor. The show isn't helped by a two-hour premiere that states and re-states its premise too many times. …
The Hollywood Reporter says:
… The problem with "Sanctuary" comes when it settles in to a predictable pace and denouement during the second half. It takes on an early thrilling ride, only to inexplicably start coasting when we need it to shift to the next gear. But the show's pedigree and premise, along with the technological breakthrough it brings to the table, make it worthy of a second look. …
Variety says:
… If yet another "Men in Black"-style, "Things that go bump in the night are real" drama sounds right up your dark alley, then "Sanctuary" is perhaps for you. Otherwise, there's little to recommend this dense drama, which recycles a number of familiar sci-fi tropes … suffers by comparison with any number of similarly themed dramas, most recently BBC America's fun-loving "Torchwood." …
9 p.m. Friday. SciFi.

From The Guy Who Wrote
The Making of Star Wars
And The Guy Who Wrote
Star Wars: The Annotated Screenplays!!


$13.49 Dawn of the Dead!!
$13.95 Road Warrior!!
$13.95 A Clockwork Orange!
$13.95 The Fugitive!
$14.95 The Shining!!
SuperCheap Blu-Ray!!

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
This is going to be shit... by Strabo | Oct 3rd, 2008 04:17:13 AM | by Quartermass-87 | Oct 3rd, 2008 04:23:00 AM | It's on Sci-Fi. by Strabo | Oct 3rd, 2008 04:34:25 AM | When a show is compared to
Torchwood.... by IAmMrMonkey! | Oct 3rd, 2008 06:31:33 AM | once every five years by jack_effing_bauer | Oct 3rd, 2008 06:43:36 AM | so they actually stole the
"immortal boss" angle, too?! by blue1622 | Oct 3rd, 2008 06:56:35 AM | Going to be better than BSG by Dazzler69 | Oct 3rd, 2008 07:22:07 AM | skiffy channel only bought
into sanctuary by palewook | Oct 3rd, 2008 07:46:26 AM | It would be good if everyone
was naked by Barmat | Oct 3rd, 2008 08:36:42 AM | so what's "an unusual amount
of green-screen"? by newc0253 | Oct 3rd, 2008 08:54:52 AM | If anybody is familiar with
the phrase Res Ipsa Loquitur by Shut the Fuck up Donny | Oct 3rd, 2008 09:16:37 AM | To answer newc0253 by Jodet | Oct 3rd, 2008 09:21:34 AM | So is the premier.... by Blackguard | Oct 3rd, 2008 10:40:06 AM | "states and re-states its
premise" by Melvin_Pelvis | Oct 3rd, 2008 12:29:48 PM | sequel to Logan's Run? by Sir Loin | Oct 3rd, 2008 01:04:21 PM | wow...so this is american? by Bouncy X | Oct 3rd, 2008 01:04:42 PM | once again BSG fanboy-haters by dioxholster | Oct 3rd, 2008 01:15:45 PM | Webisodes were NOT on
scifi.com by whoopdeedoo | Oct 3rd, 2008 01:27:08 PM | Tapping by oisin5199 | Oct 3rd, 2008 01:42:01 PM | actually they were also on
Youtube! by dioxholster | Oct 3rd, 2008 01:42:11 PM | oisin5199, i disagree by dioxholster | Oct 3rd, 2008 01:43:52 PM | It IS Canadian by Kurzinski Valentine | Oct 3rd, 2008 02:00:57 PM | iirc by Melvin_Pelvis | Oct 3rd, 2008 02:28:26 PM | wtf by FamousEccles | Oct 3rd, 2008 03:14:50 PM | As long as it's not by Melvin_Pelvis | Oct 3rd, 2008 03:15:56 PM | SANCTUARY OF GIANT CGI
GARGOYLE PYTHONS. by alice 13 | Oct 3rd, 2008 03:36:03 PM | Everyone's forgetting the main
reason to watch Sanctuary! by Amy Chasing | Oct 3rd, 2008 06:38:18 PM | wtf by Melvin_Pelvis | Oct 3rd, 2008 08:05:17 PM | Heavily Cliched by Melvin_Pelvis | Oct 3rd, 2008 09:44:27 PM | Supporting actors are horrible by jccalhoun | Oct 3rd, 2008 09:53:51 PM | Borrowed heavily from by Melvin_Pelvis | Oct 3rd, 2008 10:12:22 PM | Kinda reminded me of early
Star Trek TNG... by one_crazy_nagger | Oct 3rd, 2008 11:26:30 PM | Haven't seen the televised
version so... by Amy Chasing | Oct 3rd, 2008 11:31:59 PM | It has potential, they had to
set up the freakin premise
people. by Ka Dargo | Oct 4th, 2008 12:31:15 AM | It's like Torchwood... by TheGhostWhoLurks | Oct 4th, 2008 01:18:32 AM | Get the web episodes in high
quality from Vuze.com by ulcer | Oct 4th, 2008 01:19:01 AM | They re-shot/wrote everything
for the TV series by ulcer | Oct 4th, 2008 01:21:57 AM | I'm in two minds about this
one by Maniaq | Oct 4th, 2008 05:24:22 AM | not entirely green screen but
mostly by jccalhoun | Oct 4th, 2008 10:49:50 AM | Wait. The NY Times thinks
Eureka's better than BSG? by flickchick85 | Oct 4th, 2008 02:09:28 PM | IT SUCKED. by alice 13 | Oct 4th, 2008 03:47:45 PM | Wait. The NY Times thinks
Eureka's better than BSG? by 1895DCSkate | Oct 4th, 2008 04:07:53 PM | Bloody Awful by frankenstone | Oct 4th, 2008 05:24:50 PM | Dazzler69 by frozen01 | Oct 6th, 2008 01:35:15 PM | Huh? by frozen01 | Oct 6th, 2008 01:39:08 PM | Eureka good, but not as good
as BSG by frozen01 | Oct 6th, 2008 01:40:18 PM |
|
|